In the political dispute over the future of Tibet, the reincarnation of a spiritual leader â" the Dalai Lama â" looms as the focal point of a tug-of-war with Beijing.
Concerned with restraining a nationalist movement by controlling its living symbol, the Communist Party has proclaimed its right to approve the naming of the next incarnation, traditionally identified as a young child after his predecessorâs death.
More related to this story
- Video: PM should meet Dalai Lama, Richard Gere says
- Tell us: What would you ask the Dalai Lama?
- China should use wisdom in its approach to Tibet
At 76 years old, the 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, counters Beijingâs claims that they have the right to identify his successor with laughter and mocking jest.
âIt is quite strange â" as non-believers, totally non-believers, atheists â" showing interest about reincarnation,â the Dalai Lama said in an interview in Ottawa.
âI jokingly tell them: In order to be involved in my reincarnation, firstly, they should accept Buddhism. Or religion. Or Buddhism. Then they should recognize Chairman Mao Zedongâs reincarnation. Deng Xiaopengâs reincarnation. Then, they have reason to show some interest about the Dalai Lamaâs reincarnation. Otherwise, nonsense!â
This, after all, has to do with the reincarnation of a spiritual leader that Beijing has called a âwolf in monkâs clothingâ and criticized as a deceitful separatist. The Dalai Lama has called for Tibetan autonomy within China.
His meetings with foreign leaders, like the brief encounter he held with Prime Minister Stephen Harper Friday, always hold the risk of offending the sensitivities of a rising China.
Despite the laughter with which the Buddhist leader punctuates sentences, the Dalai Lamaâs succession is no trivial matter to Tibetans or to Chinaâs leadership. Already, he has formally retired as political leader of Tibetans in exile, passing that mantle to elected secular leaders last year. But the leader of Tibetâs largest Buddhist sect remains a potent symbol inside Tibet, and a powerful magnet for support around the world.
He has left the manner of his own spiritual succession mysterious, suggesting at times that he might be the last Dalai Lama, or that he might identify a successor while he still lives, raising consternation among some followers.
In Ottawa to attend the World Parliamentary Conference on Tibet and deliver a public speech, he offered no clarity on how it will happen: âIt is an open question,â he told The Globe and Mail.
The Tibetan cause he has led is in a period of transition, however. Last year, he handed over political leadership, ending forever, he said Friday, the centuries-old tradition of temporal Tibetan leadership by the Dalai Lama.
And the rise of China, and its influence in the world, is having an impact. Other countries sometimes fear to offer support for Tibet, he said, out of concern for economic relations with China.
In 2007, Mr. Harperâs first meeting with the Dalai Lama â" complete with a Tibetan flag on view in the Prime Ministerâs Office â" raised the ire of China and caused a chill in Ottawa-Beijing relations.
This time, Mr. Harperâs brief meeting with the Dalai Lama, described as a private courtesy call with a âspiritual leader,â was described as slight backtracking by Richard Gere, the actor and pro-Tibet campaigner who opened the Ottawa conference.
The Dalai Lama, however, congratulated Mr. Harper.
âOf course, my main purpose is not to meet with government leaders,â he said. âBut Iâm very happy that the Prime Minister â" despite some inconvenience â" he stands firmly on principle.â
It remains a question whether such stands from the outside world will ever lead to Tibetan autonomy, however. In exile since 1959, the Dalai Lama warned Friday that Tibetâs environment is being ravaged and its ancient culture is at risk of being destroyed.
Inside Tibet, things are getting worse, he said, but the hope is that the spirit of Tibetans remains strong.
What is also important, he said, is the private sympathy many Chinese intellectuals now feel â" and the signs of some concern for Tibet among government leaders who are more open-minded. Hard-liners who believe in tight control will not succeed forever, he argued.
âI think they believe every problem can be solved by force, by guns. Thatâs old thinking. During civil war, or revolutionary movements, maybe. In peacetime, I think that kind of thinking is out of date.â
No comments:
Post a Comment